Gaurav's Blog

About the image

An old sitar being tuned before it is played. Its wood is worn from decades of hands, and nothing about it is broken. Its strings were set for one room, one season, one raga, and when conditions change it does not need repair. It needs retuning, patiently, one peg at a time, listening until the note is true again.

About the strengths developed in adversity, the price we pay for them, and the internal signal to pivot

Listen to the audio version of this article.

A mouse runs a virtual maze it has run a hundred times. Left arm, reward. Left arm, reward. Then, without warning, the reward moves. The mouse turns left and finds nothing.

In that moment of nothing, a chemical called acetylcholine rises in a part of its brain that runs habits. On the trials where the rise is larger, the mouse is more likely to try the other arm next time. Silence the cells that release it, and the mouse keeps running the old route a little longer than it should, toward a reward that is no longer there.

The finding raises an older question with a newer twist. If the brain has a switch for changing course, is it set the same way in everyone? A growing body of research suggests that the world we grow up in tunes it, and that people raised amid unpredictability may carry a particular kind of competence. That idea is half right, and the half usually left out is the more useful half.

TL;DR

• The switch: In mice, acetylcholine rises in the brain’s habit circuitry when an expected reward fails to arrive, and it helps the animal abandon the old rule.
• The tuning: People raised amid unpredictability can be faster at switching between rules, mainly when conditions feel uncertain.
• The cost: The same people tend to be weaker at holding back an impulse, and quicker to see threat that isn’t there.
• The parallel: The immune system is calibrated the same way, by the mother, by microbes and by food. When its brakes are outrun, it attacks pollen or the body’s own tissue, and chronic inflammation leaves a memory in the tissue that outlasts the cause.
• The correction: In mind and body alike, recalibration is new learning layered over the old, not erasure. The old setting is outvoted, not deleted.
• The point: These are calibrations, not character flaws or superpowers. The work is to know which conditions bring out your best, and to notice when the weather has changed.

Jump to

1. A signal that says the old rule is dead
2. The brain that learned in a storm
3. Read the fine print
4. Tolerance is taught early
5. When vigilance outruns the brakes
6. The flattering version
7. Calibration, not character
8. References

A signal that says the old rule is dead

Habits are how a brain saves effort. The dorsal striatum, a structure deep in the brain, turns actions that pay off into routines that run without deliberation. That efficiency has a weakness: a routine keeps running after the world changes. Something has to say stop.

In a study published in Nature Communications in December 2025, Gideon Sarpong and Jeffery Wickens watched acetylcholine in the dorsal striatum of mice learning a virtual Y-maze. When a familiar choice was rewarded, acetylcholine dipped briefly. When the reward was quietly moved and an expected reward failed to arrive, acetylcholine rose, broadly and after a short delay. The rise was larger on trials when the mouse went on to switch arms than on trials when it stuck with the old one. When the researchers chemically silenced the cells that release acetylcholine, the mice were slower to change course, even though they ran just as fast.

It is one study, in mice, with small groups, and the silencing could not be timed to the exact moment of the missed reward. But the shape of the finding is elegant. Changing your mind is not only a decision. It has a chemical signature.

The brain does not just learn what works. It has machinery for noticing when something has stopped working.

The brain that learned in a storm

Whether that switch is set the same way in everyone is a question with a serious research program behind it.

For decades, research on children from harsh environments asked mainly what had been damaged. A group of developmental scientists led by Bruce Ellis of the University of Utah asked a different question: what might those children be good at? Their answer, the “hidden talents” framework, describes stress-adapted skills as “a form of adaptive intelligence,” abilities tuned for solving problems in harsh, unpredictable environments.

The framework separates two kinds of adversity. Harshness is threat or deprivation: violence, neglect, poverty. Unpredictability is when conditions change without warning, when a caregiver is warm one week and absent the next, or the rent is covered one month and not the next. A child growing up in an unpredictable world benefits from a brain that drops a rule the moment it stops paying.

That is roughly what Chiraag Mittal, Vladas Griskevicius and colleagues found at the University of Minnesota in 2015. Adults who reported more unpredictable childhoods were faster at shifting, switching between tasks and rules. In a group of adults followed since before birth, whose childhood unpredictability had been recorded at the time rather than remembered later, the same advantage showed up at age 37.

Seth Pollak’s work at the University of Wisconsin found a related pattern in perception. Physically abused children recognized an angry face from less visual information than other children needed, as if their perception had been trained to catch the earliest sign of a threat.

Ann Masten, whose work shaped this field, described resilience as “ordinary magic”: not a rare gift, but ordinary developmental systems doing their job under extraordinary conditions. Hidden talents are the same idea seen from another angle. The brain adapts to the world it is given.

Read the fine print

This is where the popular version and the research part ways.

The advantage is conditional. In Mittal’s experiments, including the one with adults followed since birth, the shifting advantage appeared only after participants were made to feel uncertain, by watching a slideshow about a worsening economy. Under neutral conditions it largely disappeared. The talent shows up when the present resembles the past that built it.

It comes with a cost. The same people who shifted faster were worse at inhibition, holding back an automatic response. Ellis and colleagues are explicit that every adaptation is a trade-off, and that “adaptive” means a trait paid off in a particular environment, not that it is good for health or happiness.

Speed is not accuracy. Pooled studies summarized in the framework suggest that adversity-exposed children detect threat faster but not more accurately, and Pollak’s own work found a tendency to see anger in faces that were not angry. A smoke alarm that sounds at the first wisp is useful in a house that burns often. In a calm house, it goes off for toast.

The evidence is young. The authors call it preliminary, and some replications have found no differences at all. Mittal and his co-authors put it plainly: “We are not in any way suggesting or implying that stressful childhoods are positive or good for people.”

A talent built for storms is still a talent. It is also still built for storms.

Tolerance is taught early

I have spent most of my career studying the immune system, and this pattern is familiar to me. The immune system faces the brain’s problem with higher stakes: it must decide, constantly and in real time, what is dangerous. Err one way and infections win. Err the other and the body attacks pollen, peanuts or itself. Like the brain, it does not arrive knowing the answer. It is taught, and much of the teaching happens early.

The first lessons come before birth. In the fetal thymus, young T cells that react too strongly to the body’s own proteins are culled, and some are redirected into regulatory T cells, the immune system’s brakes. Work on those brakes earned Shimon Sakaguchi, Mary Brunkow and Fred Ramsdell the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, and their importance is written plainly in a rare disease: boys born with broken copies of FOXP3, the gene that defines regulatory T cells, develop IPEX, a severe and often fatal autoimmune illness that begins in infancy. The fetus even learns to tolerate its mother. Maternal cells cross the placenta, settle in fetal lymph nodes and induce regulatory T cells that keep the fetus’s response against her in check.

After birth the classroom moves to the gut, where the immune system meets more foreign material than anywhere else. Breast milk sends in the mother’s secretory IgA, which coats bacteria and keeps them where they belong; in premature infants, a shortfall of IgA-coated bacteria preceded necrotizing enterocolitis, a dangerous intestinal inflammation. The gut lining samples what passes through and hands it to dendritic cells, which carry it to nearby lymph nodes and, with TGF-β and retinoic acid from dietary vitamin A, convert naive T cells into regulatory ones. That is oral tolerance, and timing matters. In the LEAP trial, high-risk infants who ate peanut regularly from infancy had 1.9 percent peanut allergy at age five, against 13.7 percent in those who avoided it. Every mouthful is a lesson in what not to fear.

The microbes matter as much as the meals. Children with more older siblings, children raised on traditional farms, even infants whose parents cleaned a dropped pacifier by sucking it, have less allergy; Amish children, raised among farm animals, had about a quarter of the asthma of genetically similar Hutterite children on industrialized farms. What seems to matter is stimulation, not mere presence. Finnish and Estonian infants, at high risk of early autoimmunity, were colonized by Bacteroides whose cell-wall endotoxin barely registers with innate immune cells, while infants across the Russian border met the more stimulating E. coli form. A system that hears too little early on may miss part of its education.

One cell type shows how literally the surroundings decide the outcome. Gamma delta (γδ) T cells are the first T cells the body makes, appearing in the fetal liver at five to six weeks of gestation and settling directly into the gut and skin. What they become depends on what they hear. With TGF-β and IL-15, human Vδ2 cells switch on FOXP3 and suppress other T cells. With TGF-β plus IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-23, the same cells make IL-17 and drive inflammation. The common ingredient is TGF-β; the company it keeps decides whether the cell becomes a brake or an accelerator. Keep this cell in mind. It turns up again in the gut of people with celiac disease.

The immune system learns tolerance the way a child learns a language: early, by exposure, from the world it is given.

When vigilance outruns the brakes

Allergy is the clearest case of a miscalibrated alarm. A first encounter with a harmless protein is misread as a threat, B cells make IgE against it, and that IgE arms mast cells throughout the body. From then on, every meeting with the same pollen or peanut trips a faster, harder alarm. A psychologist would recognize the shape: a single bad lesson, generalized and overlearned, like a fear conditioned in one trial. Autoimmunity is the same error turned inward, against the body’s own tissue. Both carry the trade-off seen in the brain studies, a fast, strong response with weaker restraint. A defense tuned to find enemies will find them, whether they are there or not.

Chronic inflammation goes a step further. It does not just keep the alarm ringing; it rewires the cells that ring it. Innate immune cells were long assumed to have no memory, but monocytes and macrophages that have weathered a strong inflammatory stimulus keep epigenetic and metabolic changes that leave their inflammatory genes primed to switch on faster. Because the reprogramming can reach back to their progenitors in the bone marrow, the memory can outlast the short-lived cells that first carried it. Immunologists call this trained immunity. It sharpens defense against infection, and it is increasingly implicated in chronic inflammatory disease. The parallel to a habit is hard to miss: the response has been made cheaper to run, and the cell no longer needs the original reason to run it.

The memory is also stored locally, in the tissue itself. Psoriasis tends to return to the same patches of skin, and the reason can be seen under a microscope: tissue-resident memory T cells persist in skin that looks completely healed, still ready to make the inflammatory cytokines IL-17 and IL-22 after years of effective treatment. It is the same durable immune memory I wrote about in The Oldest Part of You, here working against the body instead of for it. Celiac disease shows the same thing in the gut, and here the γδ cell returns. Gluten-driven inflammation largely erases the gut’s resident γδ population, cells tuned by the epithelium’s own butyrophilin-like molecules, and replaces it with gluten-sensitive γδ cells that make interferon-γ. A gluten-free diet calms the inflammation but does not bring the original population back. The tissue keeps the setting after the cause is gone.

This is the problem from the brain studies, written in another tissue. A prediction learned under threat does not expire when the threat does, because learning it changed the machinery that makes predictions. The two systems may also be more than analogues. Stress hormones and sympathetic nerves signal directly to immune cells, and in a New Zealand birth cohort followed to age 32, Andrea Danese and colleagues found that people maltreated as children were more likely to have clinically relevant inflammation as adults, even after accounting for other early risks, adult stress and health behaviors. It is an association, not a mechanism, but it suggests that early adversity calibrates the body’s defenses alongside the mind’s.

The flattering version

When this research reaches a general audience, it is often told as a compliment: adversity as a secret superpower, a rare kind of smart. Part of that is true. A skill built for unpredictable conditions is real, and it can sit idle, or even work against you, once life turns steady. But some of the traits celebrated in that telling are not talents at all. A reflexive suspicion of anything that comes easily, or a habit of always scanning for the exit, is what vigilance feels like from the inside. It may once have been accurate. Recast as a gift, it becomes harder to examine.

The flattering frame carries a quieter risk. If adversity becomes a superpower, the people who struggled under it can feel they failed a test others passed, and the conditions that caused the harm start to look like character building. No immunologist would call an allergy a gift because it proves the alarm works. The researchers are careful to avoid this, and so should we be.

The honest version is less flattering and more useful: you are calibrated, not broken, and not blessed.

Calibration, not character

Put the brain and the immune system side by side and the same logic runs through both. Each learns early what to expect from the world. Each sets its alarm to match. An unpredictable world tunes the mind to drop rules fast and the defenses to fire fast, and in that world both settings earn their keep. Whether signals like striatal acetylcholine are part of how early experience is stored has not yet been tested, but the shape of the problem is the same. Neither setting is better. Each fits a world.

The trouble begins when the world changes and the setting does not. It is the problem I wrote about in learned helplessness, seen from the other side. There, the brain keeps predicting that nothing works long after something would. Here, it keeps bracing for collapse long after the ground has steadied, the way healed skin keeps its memory cells.

How do you change a setting like that? Not by erasing it. Decades of work on fear extinction, much of it by the psychologist Mark Bouton, show that when a feared signal stops predicting danger, the brain does not delete the old association. It learns a new one on top, and the new one is fragile and tied to context: the old fear can return in a new setting, with the passage of time, or under stress. The immune system recalibrates the same way. Allergen immunotherapy, small and steady doses of the trigger over years, does not wipe out the IgE memory. It builds a competing tolerance on top of it, with blocking IgG4 antibodies and regulatory T and B cells. In a trial of grass-pollen immunotherapy, the benefit held for years after treatment stopped, even as immediate skin sensitivity tended to creep back. The old setting is not deleted. It is outvoted, and it has to keep being outvoted.

That is less discouraging than it sounds. It means recalibration is a practice rather than a cure: new evidence, in small, steady doses, repeated until the new prediction wins most days, and renewed when conditions change. The peanut trial adds a hopeful corollary. A lesson given early, before the alarm is set, is easier to teach than one that has to overwrite it.

For anyone who leads people, this reframes something familiar. The colleague who is unflappable in a crisis and restless in a quiet quarter may not have an attitude problem. They may be a specialist working in the wrong conditions. The colleague who senses tension in a meeting before anyone speaks may be reading signals the rest of the room has missed, or reading signals that are not there. Both are worth asking about rather than assuming.

And for anyone who recognizes themselves here: the skill is real, and so is the cost. The work is not to erase one or apologize for the other. It is to learn which conditions bring out your best, and to notice, deliberately, when the weather has changed.

I know this one from the inside. I grew up in a small town, in a quiet community with simple values and high moral standards, where kindness was usually just kindness and trust was given freely. My education reinforced it. It taught obedience and compliance, and respect for elders, but not how to discern the intentions behind a kind face or a position of authority. That is the skill I later wrote about as civil intelligence, and I had to learn it the hard way. When I moved to a different country for college, I carried that setting with me, and it did not fit. People took advantage of me, more than once. I had trouble saying no, and I tried to please. After enough repetitions, my brain did exactly what this essay describes: it relearned the rules.

Today the alarm fires most reliably at the very things I once took for granted: kindness and trust. When someone is nice, kind or understanding, or asks me to trust them, part of me starts looking for the angle. That vigilance was earned, and it has protected me. But like an immune system that has learned to treat pollen as a pathogen, it also fires at people who mean exactly what they say. So I am practicing the slow correction this essay ends on. I am not trying to delete the old lesson; I am trying to outvote it, letting each genuinely kind person stay kind long enough for the evidence to count, offering trust in measured steps rather than all at once, and learning to appreciate good people without waiting for the catch.

Habits are how a brain saves effort. Hidden talents are how it adapts to the world it was given. Wisdom may be the part that notices when that world has changed.

What is a skill you learned in a hard season that still runs when the weather is calm?

---

References

Where a free copy exists it is listed first, followed by the publisher.

Brain and behavior

1. Sarpong, G. A. & Wickens, J. R. (2025). Spatially heterogeneous acetylcholine dynamics in the striatum promote behavioral flexibility. Nature Communications, 16, 10877. Open access at Nature Communications
2. Ellis, B. J., Abrams, L. S., Masten, A. S., Sternberg, R. J., Tottenham, N. & Frankenhuis, W. E. (2022). Hidden talents in harsh environments. Development and Psychopathology, 34(1), 95–113. Cambridge University Press · DOI
3. Ellis, B. J., et al. (2023). The Hidden Talents Framework. Cambridge Elements. Free PDF at the University of Utah. The most complete review of the evidence, including its limits and trade-offs.
4. Mittal, C., Griskevicius, V., Simpson, J. A., Sung, S. & Young, E. S. (2015). Cognitive adaptations to stressful environments: When childhood adversity enhances adult executive function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 604–621. Free PDF at the University of Minnesota · DOI
5. Pollak, S. D. & Sinha, P. (2002). Effects of early experience on children’s recognition of facial displays of emotion. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 784–791. DOI
6. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238. DOI
7. Bouton, M. E. (2004). Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learning & Memory, 11(5), 485–494. DOI
8. Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Adaptive Intelligence: Surviving and Thriving in Times of Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press

Immune tolerance and chronic inflammation

1. The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet (2025). Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2025, awarded for discoveries concerning peripheral immune tolerance. nobelprize.org
2. Bennett, C. L., Christie, J., Ramsdell, F., Brunkow, M. E., et al. (2001). The immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) is caused by mutations of FOXP3. Nature Genetics, 27(1), 20–21. DOI
3. Mold, J. E., Michaëlsson, J., Burt, T. D., et al. (2008). Maternal alloantigens promote the development of tolerogenic fetal regulatory T cells in utero. Science, 322(5907), 1562–1565. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
4. Gopalakrishna, K. P., Macadangdang, B. R., Rogers, M. B., et al. (2019). Maternal IgA protects against the development of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Nature Medicine, 25(7), 1110–1115. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
5. Coombes, J. L., Siddiqui, K. R., Arancibia-Cárcamo, C. V., et al. (2007). A functionally specialized population of mucosal CD103+ DCs induces Foxp3+ regulatory T cells via a TGF-β and retinoic acid–dependent mechanism. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 204(8), 1757–1764. Mouse study. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
6. Jaensson, E., Uronen-Hansson, H., Pabst, O., et al. (2008). Small intestinal CD103+ dendritic cells display unique functional properties that are conserved between mice and humans. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 205(9), 2139–2149. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
7. Du Toit, G., Roberts, G., Sayre, P. H., et al. (2015). Randomized trial of peanut consumption in infants at risk for peanut allergy. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(9), 803–813. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
8. Strachan, D. P. (1989). Hay fever, hygiene, and household size. BMJ, 299(6710), 1259–1260. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
9. Stein, M. M., Hrusch, C. L., Gozdz, J., et al. (2016). Innate immunity and asthma risk in Amish and Hutterite farm children. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(5), 411–421. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
10. Hesselmar, B., Sjöberg, F., Saalman, R., et al. (2013). Pacifier cleaning practices and risk of allergy development. Pediatrics, 131(6), e1829–e1837. DOI
11. Vatanen, T., Kostic, A. D., d’Hennezel, E., et al. (2016). Variation in microbiome LPS immunogenicity contributes to autoimmunity in humans. Cell, 165(4), 842–853. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
12. Hu, Y., Hu, Q., Li, Y., et al. (2023). γδ T cells: origin and fate, subsets, diseases and immunotherapy. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 8, 434. Review. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
13. Casetti, R., Agrati, C., Wallace, M., et al. (2009). TGF-β1 and IL-15 induce FOXP3+ γδ regulatory T cells in the presence of antigen stimulation. Journal of Immunology, 183(6), 3574–3577. DOI
14. Caccamo, N., La Mendola, C., Orlando, V., et al. (2011). Differentiation, phenotype, and function of interleukin-17-producing human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. Blood, 118(1), 129–138. DOI
15. Netea, M. G., Domínguez-Andrés, J., Barreiro, L. B., et al. (2020). Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nature Reviews Immunology, 20(6), 375–388. Review. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
16. Cheuk, S., Wikén, M., Blomqvist, L., et al. (2014). Epidermal Th22 and Tc17 cells form a localized disease memory in clinically healed psoriasis. Journal of Immunology, 192(7), 3111–3120. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
17. Di Marco Barros, R., Roberts, N. A., Dart, R. J., et al. (2016). Epithelia use butyrophilin-like molecules to shape organ-specific γδ T cell compartments. Cell, 167(1), 203–218. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
18. Mayassi, T., Ladell, K., Gudjonson, H., et al. (2019). Chronic inflammation permanently reshapes tissue-resident immunity in celiac disease. Cell, 176(5), 967–981. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
19. Danese, A., Pariante, C. M., Caspi, A., Taylor, A. & Poulton, R. (2007). Childhood maltreatment predicts adult inflammation in a life-course study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(4), 1319–1324. Free full text at PubMed Central · DOI
20. Shamji, M. H. & Durham, S. R. (2017). Mechanisms of allergen immunotherapy for inhaled allergens and predictive biomarkers. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 140(6), 1485–1498. Review. DOI
21. Durham, S. R., Walker, S. M., Varga, E. M., et al. (1999). Long-term clinical efficacy of grass-pollen immunotherapy. New England Journal of Medicine, 341(7), 468–475. DOI